|
Author |
Message |
Netaddict
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 332
Location: Earth PS Version: CS6 OS: Windows 7 Professional
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 12:27 am Post subject: Difference between the clouds and difference clouds filters |
|
|
To the untrained eye they look the same. Is there a visual difference between both filters? |
|
|
|
|
thehermit
Joined: 05 Mar 2003
Posts: 3987
Location: Cheltenham, UK
|
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 5:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
It works with the underlying layer rather than replacing it. It produces the same pattern as cloud filter but if you use the edit>fade command and change the layer blend mode to difference then you should see the result. _________________ If life serves you lemons, make lemonade! |
|
|
|
|
Netaddict
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 332
Location: Earth PS Version: CS6 OS: Windows 7 Professional
|
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
This forum and it's members are goldmine of information about Photoshop.
Here comes another stupid question, drum-roll please...
What does the edit>fade command do?
I've tried to use it but it's always grayed out |
|
|
|
|
Netaddict
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 332
Location: Earth PS Version: CS6 OS: Windows 7 Professional
|
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Searched the net and I got it
Why is Adobe putting these redundant features in PS?
As far as I understood the fade feature/tool dies the same thing as putting or drawing something on a new layer then changing the opacity of that layer
While we are talking about redundent features, why not talk about content aware move, isn't it just; cut, paste in new location, content aware fill the hole created by cutting ?
Come on Adobe, you can do better than that!! |
|
|
|
|
|