PhotoshopForums.com Home
Navigate Contact FAQ Search Members
Overall dimensions
Post new topic   Reply to topic    PhotoshopForums.com Forum Index -> General Chat
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 See a User Guidelines violation? Please contact us.
Author Message

cbadland

Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 962



PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 9:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It shouldn't make a difference.
Since you’d almost always reduce pixel dimension for web work, I use Bicubic Sharper for that. Bicubic Smoother is a better method to add pixels if you need them. You're right, most scenarios for that would be for print. Say a firm wants 300 ppi file for a 16 X 20 image. You might be short on pixels so you upsample using Bicubic Smoother.

Before Bicubic Smoother there was a method of upsampling where you would make 10 percent increases until you got the size you needed. Supposedly gave you a nicer image than a one-time jump to the new size. Bicubic Smoother, they say, does an even better job.
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    PhotoshopForums.com Forum Index -> General Chat All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Contact - User Guidelines >

Copyright © 2003-2016. PhotoshopForums.com, iFroggy Network. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group. phpBB SEO. Privacy Policy.
We are in no way affiliated with Adobe. Photoshop, Adobe and related marks are registered trademarks of Adobe.
PhotoshopForums.com