|
Author |
Message |
Netaddict
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 332
Location: Earth PS Version: CS6 OS: Windows 7 Professional
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:41 am Post subject: Do you thibk HDR images look over processed or fake? |
|
|
I ask this because we don't see in HDR as our eyes continually adjust the "exposure" of what we are looking at.
As an example, the attached Ifle tower picture is supposidly an HDR picture but it looks to me like it's been photoshopped. If you were to stand at that exact place ( in real life) and look at the tower, your eyes will adjust the exposure of the tower so the sky and the flowers in the background won't look so "detailed". Looking at the grass, you will see the details in the flowers but not the cloud details...
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
55.45 KB |
Viewed: |
1242 Time(s) |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe3d2/fe3d2f3777e0c29c4469ee1a92f2badc9406f851" alt="tm282.jpg"
|
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad7d4/ad7d4849427f6cc9563794734746b52a0c34b55e" alt="" |
Auieos
Joined: 29 Jan 2010
Posts: 2019
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Moderation is the key.
IMHO a lot of it looks fake. I know many photographers don't like it because its used as the image equivalent of 'pimp my photo'.
The average pleb off the street seems to love HDR unless its way over the top.
Personally I think its best used certain circumstances, for instance taking a photo of a sunset and using it to highlight to foreground so its not just a black outline of the horizon.
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad7d4/ad7d4849427f6cc9563794734746b52a0c34b55e" alt="" |
Rarity
Joined: 27 Nov 2012
Posts: 329
Location: The Netherlands PS Version: CS6 OS: Windows 8
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Auieos wrote: | Moderation is the key.
IMHO a lot of it looks fake. I know many photographers don't like it because its used as the image equivalent of 'pimp my photo'.
The average pleb off the street seems to love HDR unless its way over the top.
Personally I think its best used certain circumstances, for instance taking a photo of a sunset and using it to highlight to foreground so its not just a black outline of the horizon. |
I tend to agree with this, yet I'd still like to add something to make my opinion complete.
As with most Photo(shop) effects, it's not about you showing the audience they are there, but almost to have them there without the audience knowing, the effect just enhancing the image. People making HDR photo's seem to forget this and go overboard on the sliders. I'm convinced every image can look (even just a little) better with HDR, when it's applied with the right settings and subtlety.
_________________ Bart J.A.H. de Brouwer |
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad7d4/ad7d4849427f6cc9563794734746b52a0c34b55e" alt="" |
Matt
VIP
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5739a/5739a5e20f393820de2d4b7ac90fcce519a77c3e" alt=""
Joined: 24 Sep 2007
Posts: 3515
Location: Haverhill, UK PS Version: Lightroom 5, CS4 & Elements 11 OS: Windows 8.1
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it all depends on what you are looking for.
I'm a fan of HDR as long as it's not overcooked. As you say, it can render details that the eye can not see when at the scene - however, it can also offer a better tonal range than just one exposure can capture.
If you get the balance right it can be a very effective type of photography.
Matt
_________________ Matt
3photoshop.com
http://www.3photoshop.com |
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad7d4/ad7d4849427f6cc9563794734746b52a0c34b55e" alt="" |
Netaddict
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 332
Location: Earth PS Version: CS6 OS: Windows 7 Professional
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK, so moderation is the key word here.
While we're on the topic, how and where is CS6 extended can I stack 3 different exposures of the same photo to get an HDR output?
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad7d4/ad7d4849427f6cc9563794734746b52a0c34b55e" alt="" |
Rarity
Joined: 27 Nov 2012
Posts: 329
Location: The Netherlands PS Version: CS6 OS: Windows 8
|
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Image -> Adjustments -> HDR toning
_________________ Bart J.A.H. de Brouwer |
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad7d4/ad7d4849427f6cc9563794734746b52a0c34b55e" alt="" |
Netaddict
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 332
Location: Earth PS Version: CS6 OS: Windows 7 Professional
|
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rarity, Image -> Adjustments -> HDR toning only provides sliders but does not allow stacking
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad7d4/ad7d4849427f6cc9563794734746b52a0c34b55e" alt="" |
Rarity
Joined: 27 Nov 2012
Posts: 329
Location: The Netherlands PS Version: CS6 OS: Windows 8
|
Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
My bad, File -> Automate -> Merge to HDR
_________________ Bart J.A.H. de Brouwer |
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad7d4/ad7d4849427f6cc9563794734746b52a0c34b55e" alt="" |
Netaddict
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 332
Location: Earth PS Version: CS6 OS: Windows 7 Professional
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tank you Rarity for the path to stacking, and thank you mattyboy777, Auieos and Rarity for your opinions on HDR
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad7d4/ad7d4849427f6cc9563794734746b52a0c34b55e" alt="" |
glaston1
Joined: 31 May 2013
Posts: 31
Location: United States
|
Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
My 2 cents on HDR is that once you strive to take the photo beyond what the eye can see at the actual time of the exposure, you're overdoing it.
That's why it looks fake at that point. The idea behind HDR is to bring a digital photo up to the amount of stops of exposure that the eye can see. Once you go beyond that, it starts to look fake and overdone.
Originally HDR was used to make a digital photo match the levels of exposure that traditional film is capable of. Then it got brought up to the level of exposure the human eye can see.
Now it's being brought beyond that again.
|
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad7d4/ad7d4849427f6cc9563794734746b52a0c34b55e" alt="" |
|