|
|
| Author |
Message |
jessjenn
Joined: 30 Mar 2005
Posts: 1
|
 Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2005 10:30 pm Post subject: Resizing An Image |
 |
|
Hi Everyone. I want to take a screenshot and print it under 300 resolution, but everytime I paste it into Photoshop (after I take the screenshot via CONTROL+PRINTSCREEN button), it comes out as 3x2 inches, which is too small. I would like it to be 6x7 inches, but the only way I can think to do that, is if I resize the 3x2 inches image, to 6x7 inches. This makes the image a little blurry, so I sharpen it up a little bit.
Am I doing something wrong? Thanks everyone! |
|
|
|
|
 |
teddc
Joined: 04 Oct 2004
Posts: 389
Location: Belmont North Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Try resizing the image in increments of 5% until you get your desired size. This shoud reduce the 'blurriness"
ted
_________________
WHAT WOULD VAN GOUGH HAVE DONE WITH PHOTOSHOP |
|
|
|
|
|
cbadland
Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 962
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I believe that the new “Bicubic-Smoother” interpolation choice for adding pixels in PSCS produces a better result than the stepped 5% (others 10%) upsizing technique. Or at least that’s what I’ve been told. |
|
|
|
|
|
teddc
Joined: 04 Oct 2004
Posts: 389
Location: Belmont North Australia
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well that's interesting. Thanks for the tip chad. As they say "your never to old to learn"
ted
_________________
WHAT WOULD VAN GOUGH HAVE DONE WITH PHOTOSHOP |
|
|
|
|
|
cbadland
Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 962
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
and that would be pushing near the half century mark for me. 
(and btw, the new Bicubic-Sharper mode is supposed to be better for down-sampling an image.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
