|
|
| Author |
Message |
Monty
Joined: 23 Nov 2010
Posts: 2
Location: Edmonton Alberta Canada
|
|
|
|
|
 |
thehermit
Joined: 05 Mar 2003
Posts: 3987
Location: Cheltenham, UK
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:58 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Hi and welcome to the forum, the one on the right does look edited (due mainly to the highlight behind her lower back). As to what you call an edited image that you wish to give a name to for it to appear unedited, I don't really know. I understand that for marketing purposes you don't want to say 'Photoshoped', but I don't know the term you need, as you assume you can't say 'as shot'.
_________________
If life serves you lemons, make lemonade! |
|
|
|
|
|
Monty
Joined: 23 Nov 2010
Posts: 2
Location: Edmonton Alberta Canada
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the reply and the one on the right is as shot  and not at all edited for the highlight behind her lower back that was how it was shot
|
|
|
|
|
|
kreativkid
Joined: 17 Jan 2009
Posts: 199
PS Version: CS4
OS: Windows XP
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"As captured by the camera."
Would that work?
or maybe "Untouched Photograph."?
Can't really think of anything else at the moment.
_________________
"For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord."
Romans 6:23 |
|
|
|
|
|
K-touch
Joined: 17 Jan 2010
Posts: 166
Location: Sydney, Australia.
PS Version: CS, CS2, CS3, CS4
OS: Mac OS X, Win Xp
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
darklite
Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Posts: 277
Location: Oregon, U.S.
PS Version: cs
OS: windows 7
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You can say something like: the photos are the effect of true studio lighting and have not been digitally enhanced.
_________________
Jeff
http://www.autumnwindstudios.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
